Thanks to Bill Creswell who responded to my recent blog entry, "Captioned Movie Trailers!" He gave me a web address leading to a website titled, "Subtitled Movie Trailers!" Click here to check it out!
They have over 100 trailers that are subtitled. I checked some of them out. The subtitles appear to be burnt in with the movie. Unlikely Bill Creswell's captioned trailers, you cannot turn them off. So the captions will appear a little soft rather than sharp because it's not embedded. Overall, I still recommend that everybody check the website out because they are doing quite a good job on captioning the trailers.
It's always great to see people working hard to make their websites more accessible to the deaf and hard of hearing communities.
Have a Happy New Year!
Monday, December 31, 2007
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Captioned Movie Trailers!
Bill Creswell, a web developer who works for a theatre that provides closed captioning and descriptive audio. He first contacted me earlier this year in response to my captioned vlogs and asked how I did it. I shared some information with him regarding captioning video clips.
I must say I am pleased with what he has done so far. The reason why he wanted my help in the first place was to see how he can caption the movie trailers on his own and provide them at the local theatre he's employed at. I don't know if he has managed to get any in. But he is doing a fine job of captioning movie trailers and posting them on his blog.
I certainly hope this will be the starting point of pushing the studios into providing English subtitles for the movie trailers on their websites and other websites hosting the movie trailers. I also share the same complaint toward websites like CNN.com and other websites where they provide a large amount of video clips that are inaccessible to the deaf and hard of hearing. It has been years and nothing is still being done about it despite the loud complaints.
I just want to let Bill Creswell know how I really appreciate his hard work and dedication to making the movie trailers more accessible to the deaf and hard of hearing communities around the world.
Bill, keep up the great work! I really appreciate it, and I imagine many of us do too as well. By the way, for these who are interested in watching the captioned movie trailers, just click here to gain access to Bill's website.
Enjoy!
I must say I am pleased with what he has done so far. The reason why he wanted my help in the first place was to see how he can caption the movie trailers on his own and provide them at the local theatre he's employed at. I don't know if he has managed to get any in. But he is doing a fine job of captioning movie trailers and posting them on his blog.
I certainly hope this will be the starting point of pushing the studios into providing English subtitles for the movie trailers on their websites and other websites hosting the movie trailers. I also share the same complaint toward websites like CNN.com and other websites where they provide a large amount of video clips that are inaccessible to the deaf and hard of hearing. It has been years and nothing is still being done about it despite the loud complaints.
I just want to let Bill Creswell know how I really appreciate his hard work and dedication to making the movie trailers more accessible to the deaf and hard of hearing communities around the world.
Bill, keep up the great work! I really appreciate it, and I imagine many of us do too as well. By the way, for these who are interested in watching the captioned movie trailers, just click here to gain access to Bill's website.
Enjoy!
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Senator Tom Harkin Partners with ProjectReadOn.com
Today, I was sent an e-mail from the founder of ProjectReadOn.com, Mateo Gutierrez. I was pleased to learn that a politician actually took the time to partner up with Mateo to provide closed captioning of web video for the deaf and hard of hearing internet users. Here's the press release that was issued.
Tuesday, December 4, 2007Press Release
TOMHARKIN.COM PARTNERS WITH PROJECTREADON.COM TO PROVIDE CLOSED CAPTIONING OF WEB VIDEO TO DISABLED
Harkin campaign becomes the first Senate campaign to use innovative service to provide disabled persons with access to online video.
Des Moines, IA – Senator Tom Harkin's campaign website launched a new service at www.tomharkin.com/closed-captioned-video to make the campaign's online video accessible to those with hearing disabilities through an innovative closed-captioning program provided by www.ProjectReadON.com.
A longtime champion for persons with disabilities, Senator Harkin authored the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990 to protect the civil rights of more than 54 million Americans with physical and mental disabilities.
“The Internet has been instrumental in bringing our democracy closer to the people and it is our duty as Americans to ensure that that those with disabilities can have full use of the technology,” said Senator Harkin. “The recent CNN/YouTube debates illustrated the effectiveness of online video and I am proud to be partnering with Project readON to provide technology that helps to give Americans with disabilities an equal opportunity to engage in our democracy.”
Project readON is the web's leading and most innovative closed-captioning service that works toward a single goal of making online media content available to all by giving users the power to decide exactly what videos they want captioned and by giving webmasters an innovative and easy to use caption player to install on their websites.
“When Senator Harkin’s office contacted us I can honestly say that this was perhaps the highest point in our professional life of working in the closed captioning industry. To be sought out by the person that wrote the very act that spawned our industry is, to say the least, an honor. We look forward to contributing to online video captioning becoming the norm across the web, and it’s a great personal pleasure to be a part of Senator Harkin’s online video message as he takes the lead in that effort!” -- Mateo Gutierrez, co-founder of Project readON.
The campaign will continue to update and add additional closed-captioned videos to this innovative service. For more information regarding Project readON's innovative services and technology please visit, www.projectreadon.com or contact Mateo Gutierrez at mateo.gutierrez@projectreadon.com
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Jericho Returns on February 12, 2008
I know I haven't been writing for my blog in the last couple months. I don't expect to write on a frequent basis this month, as it will be a very busy month.
Now, let's get to the good news. According to Variety, "Jericho" will return on February 12. It will be replacing the recently cancelled TV series, "Cane". It will be airing at 10:00pm, ET/PT.
As some of you may remember, "Jericho" was cancelled once the season finale was aired earlier this year. The fans started a big campaign by sending them letters and boxes of nuts. Yes, nuts. It was a reference to the season finale.
Instead of a full season, which would contain 22 to 24 episodes, they will be only airing 7 episodes. It's mainly due to the scheduling conflicts and they already had taken down the sets at the soundstage where it was filmed. A full season requires a lot of time for script writing, building new sets, casting new actors and all sorts of preparation. It's not an easy task.
You also can read a message from the president of CBS Entertainment, Nina Tassler. Just go over to Jericho's message boards to read it or just click here to read the message.
Just to let you know, it has been reported in the last couple months that they are cutting down on the cast to save money. I can't say I'm surprised. If the reports turn out to be accurate, then most of the older characters will be gone for good. That means Pamela Reed who plays Gail Green, the mother in the Green family. It has been confirmed that Skeet Ulrich (Jake Green), Lennie James (Robert Hawkins), Michael Gaston (Gray Anderson, Mayor of Jericho), Brad Beyer (Stanley Richmond), but I don't have a word on his TV deaf sister, Shoshannah Stern (Bonnie Richmond) being in any episodes of the second season. It wouldn't be a big loss, but I'm just letting you know that she may have not made the final cut. Even if you protest, she will not be in any of the episodes. They already wrapped up on the production months ago.
Alrighty, that's all I can tell you at the moment because the information on the upcoming second season is still sketchy. I must say I'm a little surprised because there are always so many spies in Hollywood. Yet it's so quiet when it comes to "Jericho". Well, maybe we'll hear something soon.
February 12, 2008 at 10:00pm ET/PT. Mark that date down in your calendar.
Now, let's get to the good news. According to Variety, "Jericho" will return on February 12. It will be replacing the recently cancelled TV series, "Cane". It will be airing at 10:00pm, ET/PT.
As some of you may remember, "Jericho" was cancelled once the season finale was aired earlier this year. The fans started a big campaign by sending them letters and boxes of nuts. Yes, nuts. It was a reference to the season finale.
Instead of a full season, which would contain 22 to 24 episodes, they will be only airing 7 episodes. It's mainly due to the scheduling conflicts and they already had taken down the sets at the soundstage where it was filmed. A full season requires a lot of time for script writing, building new sets, casting new actors and all sorts of preparation. It's not an easy task.
You also can read a message from the president of CBS Entertainment, Nina Tassler. Just go over to Jericho's message boards to read it or just click here to read the message.
Just to let you know, it has been reported in the last couple months that they are cutting down on the cast to save money. I can't say I'm surprised. If the reports turn out to be accurate, then most of the older characters will be gone for good. That means Pamela Reed who plays Gail Green, the mother in the Green family. It has been confirmed that Skeet Ulrich (Jake Green), Lennie James (Robert Hawkins), Michael Gaston (Gray Anderson, Mayor of Jericho), Brad Beyer (Stanley Richmond), but I don't have a word on his TV deaf sister, Shoshannah Stern (Bonnie Richmond) being in any episodes of the second season. It wouldn't be a big loss, but I'm just letting you know that she may have not made the final cut. Even if you protest, she will not be in any of the episodes. They already wrapped up on the production months ago.
Alrighty, that's all I can tell you at the moment because the information on the upcoming second season is still sketchy. I must say I'm a little surprised because there are always so many spies in Hollywood. Yet it's so quiet when it comes to "Jericho". Well, maybe we'll hear something soon.
February 12, 2008 at 10:00pm ET/PT. Mark that date down in your calendar.
Saturday, October 20, 2007
What's Wrong With This Picture?
Earlier this week, I went to Wal-Mart. I was browsing through the DVD racks and I came across a DVD. It grabbed my attention because of the cyan colour taking up the whole cover with a simple logo in the middle. Then I took a closer look. I was taken off guard by what I just had read. I had to read at least a few times to make sure I wasn't seeing things. Apparently I wasn't seeing things. Here's the picture. If you don't see it, take a closer look and you will see something that is considered offensive among the deaf and hard of hearing population in North America.
Do you see it?
Yes, I do think it’s an offensive phrase. However, the quote above is an excerpt taken from the novel, ‘Catcher in the Rye’’ according to Wikipedia. I’m not sure what that has to do with the story of ‘The Laughing Man’. The impression I got was that the person hired to design the logo just tossed that in for the fun of it. It’s said that the character has a fascination with the novel, ‘Catcher in the Rye’.
I’m still not sure why they had to use the particular phrase for the logo. Most people who see that cover will certainly not think of ‘Catcher in the Rye’. That certainly didn’t come to my mind when I saw the cover.
Then I dug a little deeper; the packaging design was originally from Japan. Then Anchor Bay Entertainment/Starz acquired ‘The Laughing Man’ for DVD distribution across North America. In the process, all they did was replacing the summary and added their logos on the back of the DVD cover and removed the Japanese text from the front cover. That’s all they did.
The people at Anchor Bay Entertainment need to be aware of how we perceive the logo. It is highly likely most deaf people will find the phrase to be offensive. You don’t see people putting down phrases like “I thought what I’d do was, I’d pretend I was one of those retards” onto DVD covers. Out of all the cover designs, did they really have to go with this one?
By the way, here’s the e-mail in case you want to let the people at Anchor Bay/Starz know how you feel about the cover. The e-mail will be sent directly to the Anime section. They are the people responsible for all of the Anime movies distributed by Anchor Bay/Starz.
It may not be that big of a deal but I just think it’s in bad taste and it’s not remotely funny. Especially when children can read these DVD covers. These types of phrases are a bad influence on children these days. It’s bad enough that we have children swearing to the teachers these days.
Maybe the people at Anchor Bay/Starz will hear us and realize that they made a mistake by printing that particular cover.
Or not.
A Clarification: I want people to know that I am not offended by the fact that Anchor Bay printed this. I know it is not intended to offend anyone. What I'm saying is that making a good first impression is crucial in order to sell a product. Truth is, this particular product is intended for a small number of consumers. Had it been a major blockbuster, you would hear more about it. Some readers misunderstood my true intentions of writing this particular blog entry months ago. I can see why and I would like to apologize for that. I should had been clear from the beginning that it is about making a good first impression.
Do you see it?
“I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes”
Yes, I do think it’s an offensive phrase. However, the quote above is an excerpt taken from the novel, ‘Catcher in the Rye’’ according to Wikipedia. I’m not sure what that has to do with the story of ‘The Laughing Man’. The impression I got was that the person hired to design the logo just tossed that in for the fun of it. It’s said that the character has a fascination with the novel, ‘Catcher in the Rye’.
I’m still not sure why they had to use the particular phrase for the logo. Most people who see that cover will certainly not think of ‘Catcher in the Rye’. That certainly didn’t come to my mind when I saw the cover.
Then I dug a little deeper; the packaging design was originally from Japan. Then Anchor Bay Entertainment/Starz acquired ‘The Laughing Man’ for DVD distribution across North America. In the process, all they did was replacing the summary and added their logos on the back of the DVD cover and removed the Japanese text from the front cover. That’s all they did.
The people at Anchor Bay Entertainment need to be aware of how we perceive the logo. It is highly likely most deaf people will find the phrase to be offensive. You don’t see people putting down phrases like “I thought what I’d do was, I’d pretend I was one of those retards” onto DVD covers. Out of all the cover designs, did they really have to go with this one?
By the way, here’s the e-mail in case you want to let the people at Anchor Bay/Starz know how you feel about the cover. The e-mail will be sent directly to the Anime section. They are the people responsible for all of the Anime movies distributed by Anchor Bay/Starz.
It may not be that big of a deal but I just think it’s in bad taste and it’s not remotely funny. Especially when children can read these DVD covers. These types of phrases are a bad influence on children these days. It’s bad enough that we have children swearing to the teachers these days.
Maybe the people at Anchor Bay/Starz will hear us and realize that they made a mistake by printing that particular cover.
Or not.
A Clarification: I want people to know that I am not offended by the fact that Anchor Bay printed this. I know it is not intended to offend anyone. What I'm saying is that making a good first impression is crucial in order to sell a product. Truth is, this particular product is intended for a small number of consumers. Had it been a major blockbuster, you would hear more about it. Some readers misunderstood my true intentions of writing this particular blog entry months ago. I can see why and I would like to apologize for that. I should had been clear from the beginning that it is about making a good first impression.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Rush + Limbaugh = Blackmailer
Rush Limbaugh is a radio celebrity who continues to be heard by millions everyday in the USA and America. Recently, he bragged about blackmailing a journalist into cleaning up an article, which "mischaracterizes" him. How did he blackmail him?
By making a threat toward the journalist's children. That is crossing the line; people shouldn't be dragging any family members, friends and especially their children into this sort of situation.
Here's an excerpt from his radio show,
There's even an audio clip on the website. Now, how can anyone defend this man? If the article truly did mischaracterize him then why did he resort to such a scare tactic? Hardly mischaracterizing because that's who he is.
How would you like it if I told you that I would be able to find out where your kids go to school? How about I find your medical records and post it here? People wouldn’t like it and they would feel threatened if I did that to them. It’s a classic form of blackmailing and shouldn’t be tolerated. It’s wrong. Period.
Anybody who defends him is condoning his actions. It's a pity that millions of sheep are still listening to him even to this day.
By making a threat toward the journalist's children. That is crossing the line; people shouldn't be dragging any family members, friends and especially their children into this sort of situation.
Here's an excerpt from his radio show,
I've had journalists tell me this. "Well, we're journalists." Why are you immune? Why are you immune to the same kind of destructive reporting and behavior that you dish out? You know, we have practiced -- I've practiced it once. I am not going to tell you the story because I'm don't want to give it away, and I would have to mention names, and I'm not going to mention names. But there was a cover story on me coming out of one of the big news magazines, and it was going to totally mischaracterize me and what I do and how I do it. And we found out who was writing it and made a couple phone calls to the person writing it. And we said, "You know what? We're going to find out where your kids go to school. We're going to find out who you knocked up in high school. We're going to find out what drugs you used. We're going to find out where you go to drink and do -- we're gonna find out how you paid for your house. We're going to do -- and we're going to do exact -- and we're going to say that, you know what? You are no different than Al Goldstein. You both masturbate. You're no different than Al Goldstein, and you're both journalists, and so forth."
And the guy started screaming on the phone, just went -- "You can't do that." We said, "Watch us." And it changed the tone of the story by about 60 percent, I would say, from what it was going to be. But nobody does that to these people. Nobody does it to them. And that would be so much fun. But I'd need to be wearing body armor every day. Oh, no question, these people are playing for keeps.
Source: Limbaugh says he told journalist writing on story on him: "We're going to find out where your kids go to school" - Media Matters
There's even an audio clip on the website. Now, how can anyone defend this man? If the article truly did mischaracterize him then why did he resort to such a scare tactic? Hardly mischaracterizing because that's who he is.
How would you like it if I told you that I would be able to find out where your kids go to school? How about I find your medical records and post it here? People wouldn’t like it and they would feel threatened if I did that to them. It’s a classic form of blackmailing and shouldn’t be tolerated. It’s wrong. Period.
Anybody who defends him is condoning his actions. It's a pity that millions of sheep are still listening to him even to this day.
Monday, September 24, 2007
The Influence of Marcel Marceau
Marcel Marceau was a celebrated performer among the deaf people. Though he is not deaf but it has been said that he knows sign language and had deaf pupils study under him. For instance, Bernard Bragg according to a mini-biography of his on the official website of ASL Films.There are several performers that are favoured by the deaf because they are very physical and deaf-friendly. Charlie Chaplin and Rowan Atkinson come to my mind. Rowan is widely known for playing in the role of Mr. Bean in several TV specials for BBC. The sequel to the first Mr. Bean movie, 'Mr. Bean's Holiday' is currently playing at the theatres in North America. It should also be noted that Mr. Bean rarely speaks. Instead, he's very physical. Charlie Chaplin was known for hiring deaf actors and actresses. In fact, a famous deaf painter helped Chaplin develop several techniques that were used in his silent movies. Some of you may know him as Granville Redmond. Here's the webpage where I got some of the facts on Redmond and Chaplin. Fascinating!
It was Chaplin who inspired Marcel Marceau to become an actor. Marcel Marceau is a tremendously talented performer and rarely performs with his voice. He is a very expressive mime performer, he has taught thousands of people over the years. He has been a huge influence over many especially in France where he was born in and lived in until his death. For a detailed webpage on the life of Marceau, click here. It's where I got some of the facts that I recently mentioned.
Here's a clip from the movie, 'Silent Movie' which was directed by Mel Brooks. Marcel Marceau made a short but memorable cameo appearance. At the end of the scene, he spoke.
"No!” he said.
Amy Cohen Efron made a wonderful vlog to honour the memory of Marceau. She shares a heart-warming experience that took place back in her teenage years. Click here to watch it.
Marcel Marceau, you will always be remembered by many people including the deaf communities around the world.
Saturday, September 22, 2007
Maclean's: A New Low
It's amazing what some people will publish in their magazines these days. As a Libertarian with some liberal and conservative tendencies, I am disgusted with Maclean's. It is a popular Canadian magazine, I used to read it years ago. This magazine is somewhere right-winged and often publishes articles bashing the Liberal party of both Federal and Provincial governments. I don't really have a preference when it comes to major news sources like CNN or FOX News. It varies for me; I like to get my news from a variety of websites and TV channels rather than just one channel. This way, it balances out and it's easier to spot the bias this way.To read the cover story, 'How Bush became the new Saddam'.
I'm a little surprised that the people at Maclean's actually went ahead with the cover shown above. It's in bad taste. Even though I don't think George W. Bush is a great leader by any means. Is it really that easy to believe George W. Bush is a murderer? He is not a murderer to me, but a human being who is misguided whose mistakes has resulted in gravely consequences. Thousands of Americans soldiers sacrificed their lives fighting a lost cause. Tens of thousands of Iraqis lost their lives due to the near-daily terrorist attacks and car bombs in Iraq. They are still far from stabilizing the government of Iraq. It's not really my opinion of President Bush's leadership skills that matters here, it's about having class when it come to criticizing a politician. Especially when it come to comparing him to murderous dictators.
As expected, the magazine cover is now talked about over in the USA. Here it goes again, some Americans are taking the opportunity to trash us and call us all sort of names. What really bothers me is that quite a few Americans actually believe that we are "protected" by the USA. Just because we're their neighbours doesn't mean they are protecting us which they aren't.
We are very empathic to the Americans whether they want to believe it or not. People have forgotten everything but the tragedy that struck on 9/11. Do people truly remember what they all experienced on that day on a daily basis? What I remember the most about 9/11 is how all of us grieved together on a worldwide level and we did our best to offer a hand and hope to the people affected by the terrorist attacks. We even went with them to Afghanistan to fight the terrorists and the wicked government.
The sad truth is, the friendship between us didn't last. The politics got in the way. It was the war in Iraq that torn us apart. We didn't want to join them in the fight against the government of Iraq. We had our reasons. We were shunned and they turned their backs on us. I have never seen the people of America so divided over the war and all the politics associated with it.
Is it really worth destroying a friendship over a disagreement?
To me, it isn't worth it.
We're still their neighbours and we're always here to help them out when they need it. We hope for the same in return when we need the help.
I love America and I always will.
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Sunday, September 16, 2007
Cochlear Implants: A Wedding Sermon
In this vlog, I decided to bring up a subject of something that occurred at a wedding ceremony a few weeks ago. It was a deaf couple's wedding; the bride is a good friend of mine. I've known her for many years. She is Polish and most of the family members at the wedding were Polish and many were born in Poland. In my city, they have a strong Polish community and many belong to the Roman Catholic Church.
This was my first wedding ceremony to attend where two deaf couples were getting married. I've been to several wedding ceremonies but they were all hearing. Regardless, it was a great experience and a lot of fun. A lot of deaf people attended the wedding ceremony and the reception.
The priest was Polish; he spoke in both Polish and English. The ASL interpreter was only able to interpret the spoken words that were in English. As much as I hate to say it, the priest was probably in his late 70s, maybe 80s. Now here's the real story.
I was somewhere taken back by what the priest brought up during the ceremony. Thankfully, I'm a very understanding person and I have a tendency to read people very well. The priest's intentions were obviously good and he was only trying to give the deaf people some hope. However, it's the timing that I felt wasn't appropriate.
He brought up the subject of cochlear implants.
Yes, believe it or not. He actually did bring it up during the ceremony. What I was surprised was to see the reactions from the deaf attendees. They weren't offended or angry. They looked perplexed and mumbled through the ceremony. It's nothing we haven't heard before but I certainly did not expect it at a wedding ceremony.
I haven't spoken to my friend about it, but I am pretty certain she and her husband were taken back but decided to brush it off and go on with the ceremony. It was for the best. If I was to get married, I would make sure to remind the priest to not bring up cochlear implants or subject focused on our deafness. It's not a subject I want to listen to on a day when I want to celebrate my love for a woman by marrying her.
Just my two cents.
If you have an opinion to share, feel free to share it by leaving a comment.
The Deaf Family: The Trailer
The folks at Mosdeux are at it again. They are currently producing a movie called, 'The Deaf Family'. Here's the synopsis that is featured on the official website.
Chad Taylor and Wayne Betts Jr. are co-producing the film. Chad is directing the film; Wayne is the director of photography. Many of you are familiar with their earlier works including 'Resonare', 'Vital Signs', 'Till Domestic Violence Do Us Part'. They also co-founded Mosdeux, the production company.
Sean Berdy plays one of the characters in the movie, some of you may be familiar with him. He was in the first direct-to-video sequel to 'The Sandlots'. He also has a blog of his own. You can check it out here.
Lastly, here's the official trailer for the upcoming movie, 'The Deaf Family'.
Enjoy!
Anything that could go wrong inside The Deaf Family will go wrong! This light-hearted family sitcom about a dysfunctional deaf family going through trials and tribulations as each characters experiments with something new, only to realize that by being deaf and accepting one’s identity as a deaf person, they will be accepted by everyone (including hearing people).
The story is written by DJ Kurs who also wrote A Permanent Grave.
Source: 'The Deaf Family' - The Official Website
Chad Taylor and Wayne Betts Jr. are co-producing the film. Chad is directing the film; Wayne is the director of photography. Many of you are familiar with their earlier works including 'Resonare', 'Vital Signs', 'Till Domestic Violence Do Us Part'. They also co-founded Mosdeux, the production company.
Sean Berdy plays one of the characters in the movie, some of you may be familiar with him. He was in the first direct-to-video sequel to 'The Sandlots'. He also has a blog of his own. You can check it out here.
Lastly, here's the official trailer for the upcoming movie, 'The Deaf Family'.
Enjoy!
Friday, July 27, 2007
Bionic Woman: The Deaf Character
Recently, there was a controversy surrounding the upcoming TV series, 'Bionic Woman' featuring a deaf character being portrayed by a hearing actress. Even though an executive at NBC made a request to restore the deaf character's hearing, quite a number of people still viewed the pre-air pilot episode. They often show the early episodes to the executives and critics before they air it. Most of the times, the pre-air episodes aren't completely done. The F/X effects are often incomplete for budget reasons; they will re-edit it and re-shoot some scenes.
I can confirm that the deaf character is an incredibly weak signer. I cannot say I'm surprised. They resorted to one common cliché, which is mostly talking with a few badly formed signs. If they can carry on a conversation between each other, then why are they signing at all? The older sister of the deaf character barely signs but she does sign better than the deaf character. Yes, you read that right. The hearing sister is a better signer, but she's still not a good signer, but it was definitely more understandable than the deaf character's signing.
The reason why I am looking forward to 'Bionic Woman' is because the producer is also responsible for bringing us the 21st version of 'Battlestar Galactica’, which I am a big fan of. I am relieved they decided to drop the deaf character. Even before Ridor made a public complaint regarding the deaf character being portrayed by a hearing actress. I don't blame him, as I know for a fact that hearing actresses often deliver unconvincing performances in these roles. The hearing audience may not notice that, but we do notice it.
People may say it's all about acting. Yes, it is acting. However, the true mission accomplishment of acting is that you have to convince people that you are the character, not the impersonator. Not many actors and actresses are capable of doing this in so little time they are given to research the roles. I'm not against hearing actors and actresses playing deaf characters. It's just that they often don't deliver the performance. Deaf actors and actresses are often better at portraying deaf characters because they have a better understanding of deaf characteristic traits than the hearing people do most of the times.
I'm what you call a nitpicker when it comes to movies. When they use a serious tone in a movie where deaf characters are involved, they are often poorly portrayed. They often act like they are doomed, depressed, angry and more. We rarely to get to see a truly happy deaf character in a movie or a TV program. Well, Sue Thomas F.B. Eye is an exception but it was quite a cheesy show. I have met the actress, Deanna Bray. She was pretty friendly and easy to talk to.
I don't know why I didn't mention this before but there were already rumours circulating that the actress playing the deaf character was going to be replaced prior to the public complaint generated by Ridor. I cannot remember where I got the information; there are thousands of sources out there so I'm just going to say it. The test audience didn't find the deaf character to be interesting, the character was found to be one of the weak points. Some also were suspicious to the character because of the older sister being the Bionic Woman.
Some speculated that the deaf character's hearing might get restored later in the show, which was somewhere too predictive. TV producers these days don't like the word, predictive because they feel it does more harm than good to the show, which is somewhere true. Unless we get a word from an insider within NBC, we won't know what the real reason was if there is one. So far, we only know that the creative team didn't feel too happy with the character and the actress. So they changed it.
Yes, I openly prefer that deaf actors and actresses portray the deaf characters because I believe they can do justice to them in comparison to the hearing actors and actresses. That's just my preference.
I'm glad they decided to drop the deaf character because I didn't like the direction they were going in with the deaf character to start with. It was too obvious and too much of a cliché for my taste.
That's all I have to say for today. Have a good day.
I can confirm that the deaf character is an incredibly weak signer. I cannot say I'm surprised. They resorted to one common cliché, which is mostly talking with a few badly formed signs. If they can carry on a conversation between each other, then why are they signing at all? The older sister of the deaf character barely signs but she does sign better than the deaf character. Yes, you read that right. The hearing sister is a better signer, but she's still not a good signer, but it was definitely more understandable than the deaf character's signing.
The reason why I am looking forward to 'Bionic Woman' is because the producer is also responsible for bringing us the 21st version of 'Battlestar Galactica’, which I am a big fan of. I am relieved they decided to drop the deaf character. Even before Ridor made a public complaint regarding the deaf character being portrayed by a hearing actress. I don't blame him, as I know for a fact that hearing actresses often deliver unconvincing performances in these roles. The hearing audience may not notice that, but we do notice it.
People may say it's all about acting. Yes, it is acting. However, the true mission accomplishment of acting is that you have to convince people that you are the character, not the impersonator. Not many actors and actresses are capable of doing this in so little time they are given to research the roles. I'm not against hearing actors and actresses playing deaf characters. It's just that they often don't deliver the performance. Deaf actors and actresses are often better at portraying deaf characters because they have a better understanding of deaf characteristic traits than the hearing people do most of the times.
I'm what you call a nitpicker when it comes to movies. When they use a serious tone in a movie where deaf characters are involved, they are often poorly portrayed. They often act like they are doomed, depressed, angry and more. We rarely to get to see a truly happy deaf character in a movie or a TV program. Well, Sue Thomas F.B. Eye is an exception but it was quite a cheesy show. I have met the actress, Deanna Bray. She was pretty friendly and easy to talk to.
I don't know why I didn't mention this before but there were already rumours circulating that the actress playing the deaf character was going to be replaced prior to the public complaint generated by Ridor. I cannot remember where I got the information; there are thousands of sources out there so I'm just going to say it. The test audience didn't find the deaf character to be interesting, the character was found to be one of the weak points. Some also were suspicious to the character because of the older sister being the Bionic Woman.
Some speculated that the deaf character's hearing might get restored later in the show, which was somewhere too predictive. TV producers these days don't like the word, predictive because they feel it does more harm than good to the show, which is somewhere true. Unless we get a word from an insider within NBC, we won't know what the real reason was if there is one. So far, we only know that the creative team didn't feel too happy with the character and the actress. So they changed it.
Yes, I openly prefer that deaf actors and actresses portray the deaf characters because I believe they can do justice to them in comparison to the hearing actors and actresses. That's just my preference.
I'm glad they decided to drop the deaf character because I didn't like the direction they were going in with the deaf character to start with. It was too obvious and too much of a cliché for my taste.
That's all I have to say for today. Have a good day.
Sunday, July 22, 2007
Harry Potter and the Spoilers
This is a spoiler-free vlog and blog entry.
In this vlog, I make an observation regarding the popularity of 'Harry Potter'. It's more of a question toward some people. I always get asked about what happens in the Harry Potter novels. They want to know all the spoilers, but what I don't get is that they don't even read the books. Yet they want to know what happen in the novels.
Don't you find that kind of perplexing that people would want to know all the details so they don't have to read the books? Reading is part of the excitement, you don't get that from reading the spoilers on a website. If you were to ask me such a question, I'll tell you to read the book. I'm not a walking Cliff's Notes book.
People also try to use the movies as an excuse to learn all the spoilers. The thing is, if you don't read the books. Why would you want to know what to expect from the movies? Not knowing what to expect from a movie is part of the excitement. There's no fun in knowing what's going to happen in a scene. I don't like having people telling me the boogeyman is going to pop out of the closet in an upcoming scene because it deflates the suspense.
People also try to use the excuse of not having enough time to read. That is one of the most rubbish excuses they can possibly think of. If you have the time to read my blog and others', read your e-mails, the news and watch movies. Then you can find the time to read a book. I don't want to call anybody lazy, but people who want to know all the details in order to avoid reading are lazy.
Reading and writing is the best way to refine and preserve your literacy skills. Nowadays, too many people try to take a shortcut on everything. Every choice has consequences, especially if they are bad choices.
If you feel offended. I'm sorry but that's what I'm seeing here. I am interested in what some of you have to say on the subject because it is a subject that doesn’t settle too well with me.
In this vlog, I make an observation regarding the popularity of 'Harry Potter'. It's more of a question toward some people. I always get asked about what happens in the Harry Potter novels. They want to know all the spoilers, but what I don't get is that they don't even read the books. Yet they want to know what happen in the novels.
Don't you find that kind of perplexing that people would want to know all the details so they don't have to read the books? Reading is part of the excitement, you don't get that from reading the spoilers on a website. If you were to ask me such a question, I'll tell you to read the book. I'm not a walking Cliff's Notes book.
People also try to use the movies as an excuse to learn all the spoilers. The thing is, if you don't read the books. Why would you want to know what to expect from the movies? Not knowing what to expect from a movie is part of the excitement. There's no fun in knowing what's going to happen in a scene. I don't like having people telling me the boogeyman is going to pop out of the closet in an upcoming scene because it deflates the suspense.
People also try to use the excuse of not having enough time to read. That is one of the most rubbish excuses they can possibly think of. If you have the time to read my blog and others', read your e-mails, the news and watch movies. Then you can find the time to read a book. I don't want to call anybody lazy, but people who want to know all the details in order to avoid reading are lazy.
Reading and writing is the best way to refine and preserve your literacy skills. Nowadays, too many people try to take a shortcut on everything. Every choice has consequences, especially if they are bad choices.
If you feel offended. I'm sorry but that's what I'm seeing here. I am interested in what some of you have to say on the subject because it is a subject that doesn’t settle too well with me.
Friday, July 13, 2007
American Sign Language In Ontario's Schools
Last night, an article was published over the internet. This is good news for the deaf communities across the province of Ontario in Canada. The government of Ontario is making a promise to improve the learning environment for the students who are deaf or hard of hearing. They are going to allow ASL and LSQ to be used in classrooms. This is for public-funded schools, not just schools for the deaf. The schools for the deaf across Ontario have been using ASL for years.
McGuinty Government Delivering More Support For Students Who Are DeafThis is excellent news. I'm glad that we're finally making some progress. The deaf and hard of hearing students need to be given the opportunity to be in a learning environment where there is no barrier. 100% access is incredibly important. I think it's a good move by the government to offer the teachers and interpreters courses on learning ASL and LSQ. Maybe not many teachers will take it, but you never know. The more, the better it will be.
Teachers Can Use American Sign Language In Ontario's Schools
TORONTO, July 12 /CNW/ - The McGuinty government is improving the learning environment for students who are deaf or hard of hearing by permitting American Sign Language (ASL) and Langue des signes québécoise (LSQ) to be used in Ontario schools, Education Minister Kathleen Wynne announced today.
"We are committed to ensuring that students who are deaf receive an education that helps them reach their full potential," said Wynne. "I'm proud of the partnerships we have built with the deaf community to take this important step forward together."
Publicly funded school boards are encouraged to offer ASL and LSQ to students in the classroom if it will benefit their education. These sign languages can also be used for discipline or school management.
A number of initiatives are also underway to help school boards and provincial schools for students who are deaf and hard of hearing hire qualified staff. These initiatives include:In addition, the government is currently working with VOICE for Hearing Impaired Children to find ways to enhance the education of students who use an auditory-verbal approach to learning and communicating.
- Developing a sign language curriculum
- Increasing the number of colleges and universities that offer ASL and LSQ courses to teachers and interpreters
- Helping staff in provincial schools improve their ASL and English communication skills
- Working with the Ontario College of Teachers to offer a new qualification program requiring teachers to have some ASL or LSQ training before teaching students who are deaf or hard of hearing.
"Thank you to the government for working with us to find solutions that will help more students succeed," said Wayne Nicholson, president of the Ontario Association of the Deaf. "More teachers using sign languages in schools means more students who are deaf receiving a top-quality education."
"We are moving in the right direction to ensure all children who are deaf succeed - linguistically and academically," said Chris Kenopic, chair of the American Sign Language Services for Deaf Children in Ontario, a parent support group. "This announcement will build a promising future for students in their education and employment opportunities, and most importantly, provide students with greater self-esteem and confidence as deaf individuals in achieving goals to succeed in life."
Click here to read the full article.
Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Germany Hates Tom Cruise
Recently, the German government banned the film production, 'Valkyrie' from their military bases.
Why?
Because Tom Cruise is a scientologist.
This isn't the first time this happened. Back in 1996, they called for a boycott of "Mission: Impossible" and other movies he starred in. The boycott didn't work so well since the movie brought in $24.2 million. The new movie, "Valkyrie" has absolutely nothing to do with Scientology. Not one bit. So the government really had no reason to ban the production from filming at their military bases if they allow the others to do so.
It's bizarre how the government just blatantly discriminated Tom Cruise in such a manner. I can't help it myself but think of the Third Reich whenever a story like this is brought up. I imagine a lot of people got the same impression as I did. You can read more on the situation, just click here.
In the movie, Tom Cruise portrays the German officer, Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg. A historical figure celebrated for trying to kill Adolf Hitler in 1944. The German Defense Ministry warned that if Tom Cruise were to play the role, they wouldn't allow the filming to take place at the ministry sites because of his involvement with the church of Scientology.
Von Stauffenberg's son objected to the idea of Tom Cruise stepping into the role of his father. Though he is entitled to his opinion, but he has no call in who can and cannot play the role of his father. This isn't a matter of how the family feels; it's about how the government practices discrimination against people for being involved with a church like Scientology.
It's already disturbing enough to imagine a government practicing discrimination against people of different religions and philosophies. Now that I know the government of Germany is one of them. It is like a slap to the face because many soldiers from around the country fought and died to stop the Third Reich from dominating Europe. Now this is how they operate the government, they practice a strong form of censorship. People cannot express their opinions freely.
In fact, it's a crime to deny that the holocaust took place. You can go to jail for it. As much as I believe the holocaust took place and I have met people who went through with it. I will not agree with the idea of sending people to the prison for saying otherwise. People live in fear and cannot express themselves as freely as they would like to even if they were wrong.
The Germans should be ashamed of their government; which I imagine a lot of them are.
Why?
Because Tom Cruise is a scientologist.
This isn't the first time this happened. Back in 1996, they called for a boycott of "Mission: Impossible" and other movies he starred in. The boycott didn't work so well since the movie brought in $24.2 million. The new movie, "Valkyrie" has absolutely nothing to do with Scientology. Not one bit. So the government really had no reason to ban the production from filming at their military bases if they allow the others to do so.
It's bizarre how the government just blatantly discriminated Tom Cruise in such a manner. I can't help it myself but think of the Third Reich whenever a story like this is brought up. I imagine a lot of people got the same impression as I did. You can read more on the situation, just click here.
In the movie, Tom Cruise portrays the German officer, Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg. A historical figure celebrated for trying to kill Adolf Hitler in 1944. The German Defense Ministry warned that if Tom Cruise were to play the role, they wouldn't allow the filming to take place at the ministry sites because of his involvement with the church of Scientology.
Von Stauffenberg's son objected to the idea of Tom Cruise stepping into the role of his father. Though he is entitled to his opinion, but he has no call in who can and cannot play the role of his father. This isn't a matter of how the family feels; it's about how the government practices discrimination against people for being involved with a church like Scientology.
It's already disturbing enough to imagine a government practicing discrimination against people of different religions and philosophies. Now that I know the government of Germany is one of them. It is like a slap to the face because many soldiers from around the country fought and died to stop the Third Reich from dominating Europe. Now this is how they operate the government, they practice a strong form of censorship. People cannot express their opinions freely.
In fact, it's a crime to deny that the holocaust took place. You can go to jail for it. As much as I believe the holocaust took place and I have met people who went through with it. I will not agree with the idea of sending people to the prison for saying otherwise. People live in fear and cannot express themselves as freely as they would like to even if they were wrong.
The Germans should be ashamed of their government; which I imagine a lot of them are.
Monday, June 25, 2007
Banjo's Recommendations: No. 018
'Trading Places' DVD Packaging@1983 Paramount Pictures. All Right Reserved
Thursday, June 21, 2007
Aspect Ratios: What You Should Know
Thank you for all the positive feedback regarding my last blog entry titled, 'HDTV Captioning: What You Should Know'. As a result, here's another 'What You Should Know' column.
The reason why I'm writing this is in response to several complaints among some deaf people regarding subtitle issues while watching movies on their DVD players. There are a lot of people out there who dislike watching movies where black bars are present. I prefer watching movies in their original aspect ratio; which mean black bars will be displayed quite often.
Before the fifties, movies were often filmed and projected in the aspect ratio of 1.33:1, which is what most television sets are set at. Though that is changing, as there's a lot of widescreen television sets on the market. They are already mainstreamed as of a few years ago. Most widescreen TV displays are set at around 1.78:1. Many television programs today are filmed in 1.78:1.
Then when the television sets were starting to become popular in households, the theatre owners started to see a decline in audience attendance. So they came up with a new aspect ratio and convinced people that the wider the movie, the better. In fact, many film lovers including myself agree with the philosophy. An aspect ratio of 1.85:1 and 2.35:1 give the movie a much more cinematic look to it compared to 1.33:1.
Anyway, the problem with subtitles is that they are images, not text. So when you turn them on, they are locked into their place all through the movie. You cannot move it or adjust the size of the subtitles. It doesn't help especially when most television sets already over scan the pictures to start with.
What is an overscan?
There are a few types of overscan. There are two common overscan types starting with optical overscan and digital zoom. Optical overscan is when the TV showing less of the picture rather than the whole picture. Most of the times, it's just mostly borders with a little of the actual image cut off. Digital zoom, it's when the image is scaled or zoomed so it will be larger than the visible area. If your television set does that, you cannot disable it so you may face some problems with subtitles. Usually, it's the super-cheap television sets the deaf consumers should think twice before buying. There are some affordable television sets that won't overscan enough to crop the subtitles, but you should at least do research before buying a television set.
A lot of people make a habit out of zooming into their movies to get rid of the black bars. What will happen is that the subtitles will be cropped out of the display area. Not only to mention that it will decrease the picture quality of the movie. If you have a standard television (1.33:1) and prefer to watch movie in full frame meaning no black bars, you should buy DVDs that are marked 'Full Screen' or 'Full Frame', or where it says 1.33:1 or 1.33. Avoid any DVDs marked 'Widescreen' or the aspect ratios, 1.78:1, 2.35:1 or 2.40:1. If you have a widescreen display and still don't want black bars, avoid any DVDs that are in 1.33:1 or 2.35:1 and 2.40:1. Stick to either 1.78:1 or 1.85:1.
I do have some good news for the Blu-ray owners who prefer to fill up the screen by eliminating the black bars. Sony will be implementing a new feature onto future titles. The new feature will allow us to re-position the subtitles after the black bars are eliminated. Mainly, it is for projectors that are set to project 2.35:1 which result in eliminating the black bars, so will be the subtitles. This won't be possible on the DVD players, they lack the technology needed to use it.
I made some graphic examples for people who want to learn more about the aspect ratios used.
The three examples below, the screen size represents the standard televisions (4:3, Full Frame), the most common screen size used in North America. In each example, the aspect ratio is displayed and named. The black area represent the whole aspect ratio used within a 4:3 television set. The area labelled ‘Black Bars’ is unused area. A lot of people find the black bars to be an annoyance because they believe they are seeing less of the movie, which they are not. It's the other way around; they are getting the whole movie in its full glory.
The three examples below, the screen size represents the widescreen televisions (16:9 or 1.78:1), a mainstreamed screen size used in North America. In each example, the aspect ratio is displayed and named. The black area represent the whole aspect ratio used within a 16:9 (1.78:1) television set. The area labelled ‘Black Bars’ is unused area. In the aspect ratio of 2.35:1, black bars will appear at the top and bottom. The only aspect ratio that will fill up the whole widescreen display is if the movie is in either 1.78:1 or 1.85:1. The black bars will be displayed when a 1.33:1 (4:3, Full-Frame) movie is displayed, the only difference is that it will appear on the sides instead of the top and bottom.
The bottom line is, the best solution is to avoid using the zoom function if you want the subtitles to stay in the picture.
The reason why I'm writing this is in response to several complaints among some deaf people regarding subtitle issues while watching movies on their DVD players. There are a lot of people out there who dislike watching movies where black bars are present. I prefer watching movies in their original aspect ratio; which mean black bars will be displayed quite often.
Before the fifties, movies were often filmed and projected in the aspect ratio of 1.33:1, which is what most television sets are set at. Though that is changing, as there's a lot of widescreen television sets on the market. They are already mainstreamed as of a few years ago. Most widescreen TV displays are set at around 1.78:1. Many television programs today are filmed in 1.78:1.
Then when the television sets were starting to become popular in households, the theatre owners started to see a decline in audience attendance. So they came up with a new aspect ratio and convinced people that the wider the movie, the better. In fact, many film lovers including myself agree with the philosophy. An aspect ratio of 1.85:1 and 2.35:1 give the movie a much more cinematic look to it compared to 1.33:1.
Anyway, the problem with subtitles is that they are images, not text. So when you turn them on, they are locked into their place all through the movie. You cannot move it or adjust the size of the subtitles. It doesn't help especially when most television sets already over scan the pictures to start with.
What is an overscan?
There are a few types of overscan. There are two common overscan types starting with optical overscan and digital zoom. Optical overscan is when the TV showing less of the picture rather than the whole picture. Most of the times, it's just mostly borders with a little of the actual image cut off. Digital zoom, it's when the image is scaled or zoomed so it will be larger than the visible area. If your television set does that, you cannot disable it so you may face some problems with subtitles. Usually, it's the super-cheap television sets the deaf consumers should think twice before buying. There are some affordable television sets that won't overscan enough to crop the subtitles, but you should at least do research before buying a television set.
A lot of people make a habit out of zooming into their movies to get rid of the black bars. What will happen is that the subtitles will be cropped out of the display area. Not only to mention that it will decrease the picture quality of the movie. If you have a standard television (1.33:1) and prefer to watch movie in full frame meaning no black bars, you should buy DVDs that are marked 'Full Screen' or 'Full Frame', or where it says 1.33:1 or 1.33. Avoid any DVDs marked 'Widescreen' or the aspect ratios, 1.78:1, 2.35:1 or 2.40:1. If you have a widescreen display and still don't want black bars, avoid any DVDs that are in 1.33:1 or 2.35:1 and 2.40:1. Stick to either 1.78:1 or 1.85:1.
I do have some good news for the Blu-ray owners who prefer to fill up the screen by eliminating the black bars. Sony will be implementing a new feature onto future titles. The new feature will allow us to re-position the subtitles after the black bars are eliminated. Mainly, it is for projectors that are set to project 2.35:1 which result in eliminating the black bars, so will be the subtitles. This won't be possible on the DVD players, they lack the technology needed to use it.
I made some graphic examples for people who want to learn more about the aspect ratios used.
The three examples below, the screen size represents the standard televisions (4:3, Full Frame), the most common screen size used in North America. In each example, the aspect ratio is displayed and named. The black area represent the whole aspect ratio used within a 4:3 television set. The area labelled ‘Black Bars’ is unused area. A lot of people find the black bars to be an annoyance because they believe they are seeing less of the movie, which they are not. It's the other way around; they are getting the whole movie in its full glory.
The three examples below, the screen size represents the widescreen televisions (16:9 or 1.78:1), a mainstreamed screen size used in North America. In each example, the aspect ratio is displayed and named. The black area represent the whole aspect ratio used within a 16:9 (1.78:1) television set. The area labelled ‘Black Bars’ is unused area. In the aspect ratio of 2.35:1, black bars will appear at the top and bottom. The only aspect ratio that will fill up the whole widescreen display is if the movie is in either 1.78:1 or 1.85:1. The black bars will be displayed when a 1.33:1 (4:3, Full-Frame) movie is displayed, the only difference is that it will appear on the sides instead of the top and bottom.
The bottom line is, the best solution is to avoid using the zoom function if you want the subtitles to stay in the picture.
Monday, June 18, 2007
HDTV Captioning: What You Should Know
The technology of closed captioning is a wonderful tool for the deaf and hard of hearing. Even the hearing people are finding the benefits in using the technology. I just want to let everybody know that this blog entry will not be covering the issues regarding the problems with captioning on HD channels through some cable/satellite services. Mainly, I will be focusing on all DVD, Blu-ray Disc and HD DVD and the HDTV displays. I do feel that it's important that people understand the issues surrounding these formats. It concerns the technology of closed captioning. It is crucial that the deaf consumers become aware of this as many salespeople at stores like Best Buy, Circuit City and more tend to lack knowledge on the technology of captioning.
Closed Captioning Logo
More than ten years ago, high definition televisions started making their way onto the market. There are several resolutions available now including 480i, 480p, 720p, 768p, 1080i and 1080p. Now you may be asking how this concerns you and your needs. It's important that you know why.
For these unfamiliar with the resolutions I just mentioned, below is a picture showing the difference between all resolutions.
Here's an example, if you set your computer's resolution to 800x600. The last number, 600 would be known as 600p, for 1024x768, it would be 768p because all computer monitors are already in progressive.
If you have seen some people using terms like 1080p24 and 1080p60. Both 24 and 60 are refresh rates. 24 frames per second and 60 frames per second. The standard frame rate for movies is approximately 24 (23.97) frames per second. So that's basically the best way to watch movies. If you are to buy a 1080p HDTV, be sure to check that it offer this option.
The problem with a lot of HDTV displays is that they can be difficult to work with when it comes to closed captioning. Every time they make an upgrade in resolution, there will be a problem with closed captioning. Especially with two video inputs, DVI (Digital Visual Interface) and HDMI (High Definition Multimedia Interface). On many HDTV displays, the option to select CC is nowhere to be found when one of these inputs is on display.
Digital Visual Interface Logo
High Definition Multimedia Interface Logo
Component video inputs, many offer CC as an option when the video input is on display. Though many DVD players will be unable to send the CC signal once it is set in progressive mode. Many deaf consumers end up using the DVD player in 480i even on their HDTV displays. It's the same situation in 720p and 1080i.
Component Cables
CC is an analog technology; the information is entered at every 21st line in the 480i mode. In the 480p mode, they have nowhere to put it because all 480 lines are displayed at once. They do now offer digital closed captioning on many HDTV displays. However, it's not as user-friendly as one would think. Not even with DVD players. There are at least 2 standard digital closed captioning modes that I know of. I'm still reading about many deaf consumers who face problems with their DVD players when the progressive mode is enabled. The truth is, no deaf consumer should ever have to put up with it.
This is an example of what an interlaced signal look like. The lines are much more visible in the interlaced mode. Only half of the 480 lines appear per frame.
This is what a progressive scan signal look like, the lines are much less visible because they all appear at once.
Now, we're moving onto SDH. It either stands for 'Subtitles for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing' or 'Subtitled for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing'. This is important for the deaf and hard of hearing consumers to understand. There is a difference between SDH and English subtitles when it's mentioned on the back of a DVD case. When it says, 'English Subtitles', it's not often formatted for the deaf. It will exclude all background noise, names, common words people may be familiar with, song lyrics and more.
SDH (Subtitled for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing) Logo
Myself, I now prefer SDH because it guarantee that you will get access at any given time regardless of what you are using, a portable DVD player with a small LCD display, a TV with no closed captioning decoder built in, on the computer and more.
The truth is, the major studios are leaning toward SDH because of the easiness with working with them and the fact that people can subtitle the movies within the DVD authoring software. Apple's DVD Studio offers this option. Not only to mention that it's probably the cheaper solution because they won't have to pay for the captioning equipment, which isn't cheap. I have looked up the prices for some of the equipments and software used to caption movies, they are not as cost effective since many DVD authoring software already offer the option to subtitle movies.
Universal Studios was one of the first studios on the DVD format to use SDH instead of CC. Though it was labeled as captions for the first few years till the term, SDH was introduced. I am not sure why Universal Studios chose to go on this path to start with but I wouldn't be surprised if it was the progressive scan mode causing headaches at Universal Studios.
Two new high definition video formats, Blu-ray Disc and HD DVD (High Density Digital Versatile Disc) were released last year. The majority of the movies released on both high definition formats lack analog/digital closed captioning. I’m not entirely confident but I believe none of the movies available on either Blu-ray Disc or HD DVD include analog CC. I believe it’s due to the reason I mentioned earlier. The HDMI and DVI inputs often lack the ability to display CC. So the movie studios are going the SDH route to make it easier on the consumers. I will be the first to admit that it's not perfect yet because of how most of them format it. The dialogues should be placed all over the screen rather than dead-on centre on the screen through the whole movie. They also often lack a solid or transparent background behind the subtitles. But I am pleased to tell you that they do include all the information as they do with closed captioning on the DVD and VHS.
As far I can tell you, Fox Home Entertainment and Sony are the best when it comes to formatting the SDH. Fox Home Entertainment uses a strong black stroke all around the subtitles. Sony formats the SDH to bear a strong resemblance to the old-fashioned CC style, which I do appreciate. In fact, Sony even moves them around the screen like they do with CC. Though Sony's SDH style can only be found on their Blu-ray Disc titles.
I made some examples for you to look at to get the idea of how a SDH is formatted and the difference between English subtitles and SDH.
The subtitle shown above is a common format seen on many DVD titles using English subtitles. They often exclude people's names from the dialogues.
The subtitle shown above is a common format seen on many DVD titles using SDH. They often include people's names from the dialogues.
The subtitle shown above is a format seen on some DVD titles and is strongly disliked due to the lack of black strokes around the subtitles making it difficult to read if the background is too light.
The subtitles shown above are the SDH format Sony use on their Blu-ray titles. Like I told you, it bears a strong resemblance to the closed captioning style.
The subtitles shown above show a description of a sound heard in the background. This is the kind of information you can expect to find on a DVD/Blu-ray/HD DVD where SDH is used.
Nothing appears on the screen at all, this is what you can expect from watching a movie with English subtitles, it is obviously not formatted for the deaf and hard of hearing. It's for people who are learning English or these who like to read subtitles.
Here's another example of how English subtitles is formatted. In the dialogue, the person's name is spoken but isn't included in the subtitle because the hearing people will already know who the person is. So it is not necessary to name the person.
As you can see, both images above show subtitles including the person's name rather than excluding it. This is important for the deaf and hard of hearing consumers. They need to know who's saying these lines, if they don't include this kind of information, people may end up finding it difficult to follow the storyline and whose lines it is.
Whew, what a long blog entry. It’s a blog entry I started on last week but I had to put it off for a while. Now that I’m on my vacation, I decided to finish it and publish it. I hope many people will find the information useful and helpful and clear up the confusion among many deaf consumers when it comes to HDTV displays, DVD and the high definition video formats.
If you have any questions or have something to share, feel free to leave a comment.
Closed Captioning LogoFor these unfamiliar with the resolutions I just mentioned, below is a picture showing the difference between all resolutions.
Here's an example, if you set your computer's resolution to 800x600. The last number, 600 would be known as 600p, for 1024x768, it would be 768p because all computer monitors are already in progressive.
If you have seen some people using terms like 1080p24 and 1080p60. Both 24 and 60 are refresh rates. 24 frames per second and 60 frames per second. The standard frame rate for movies is approximately 24 (23.97) frames per second. So that's basically the best way to watch movies. If you are to buy a 1080p HDTV, be sure to check that it offer this option.
The problem with a lot of HDTV displays is that they can be difficult to work with when it comes to closed captioning. Every time they make an upgrade in resolution, there will be a problem with closed captioning. Especially with two video inputs, DVI (Digital Visual Interface) and HDMI (High Definition Multimedia Interface). On many HDTV displays, the option to select CC is nowhere to be found when one of these inputs is on display.
Digital Visual Interface Logo
High Definition Multimedia Interface LogoComponent video inputs, many offer CC as an option when the video input is on display. Though many DVD players will be unable to send the CC signal once it is set in progressive mode. Many deaf consumers end up using the DVD player in 480i even on their HDTV displays. It's the same situation in 720p and 1080i.
Component Cables
This is an example of what an interlaced signal look like. The lines are much more visible in the interlaced mode. Only half of the 480 lines appear per frame.
This is what a progressive scan signal look like, the lines are much less visible because they all appear at once.
Now, we're moving onto SDH. It either stands for 'Subtitles for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing' or 'Subtitled for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing'. This is important for the deaf and hard of hearing consumers to understand. There is a difference between SDH and English subtitles when it's mentioned on the back of a DVD case. When it says, 'English Subtitles', it's not often formatted for the deaf. It will exclude all background noise, names, common words people may be familiar with, song lyrics and more.
SDH (Subtitled for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing) LogoThe truth is, the major studios are leaning toward SDH because of the easiness with working with them and the fact that people can subtitle the movies within the DVD authoring software. Apple's DVD Studio offers this option. Not only to mention that it's probably the cheaper solution because they won't have to pay for the captioning equipment, which isn't cheap. I have looked up the prices for some of the equipments and software used to caption movies, they are not as cost effective since many DVD authoring software already offer the option to subtitle movies.
Universal Studios was one of the first studios on the DVD format to use SDH instead of CC. Though it was labeled as captions for the first few years till the term, SDH was introduced. I am not sure why Universal Studios chose to go on this path to start with but I wouldn't be surprised if it was the progressive scan mode causing headaches at Universal Studios.
Two new high definition video formats, Blu-ray Disc and HD DVD (High Density Digital Versatile Disc) were released last year. The majority of the movies released on both high definition formats lack analog/digital closed captioning. I’m not entirely confident but I believe none of the movies available on either Blu-ray Disc or HD DVD include analog CC. I believe it’s due to the reason I mentioned earlier. The HDMI and DVI inputs often lack the ability to display CC. So the movie studios are going the SDH route to make it easier on the consumers. I will be the first to admit that it's not perfect yet because of how most of them format it. The dialogues should be placed all over the screen rather than dead-on centre on the screen through the whole movie. They also often lack a solid or transparent background behind the subtitles. But I am pleased to tell you that they do include all the information as they do with closed captioning on the DVD and VHS.
As far I can tell you, Fox Home Entertainment and Sony are the best when it comes to formatting the SDH. Fox Home Entertainment uses a strong black stroke all around the subtitles. Sony formats the SDH to bear a strong resemblance to the old-fashioned CC style, which I do appreciate. In fact, Sony even moves them around the screen like they do with CC. Though Sony's SDH style can only be found on their Blu-ray Disc titles.
I made some examples for you to look at to get the idea of how a SDH is formatted and the difference between English subtitles and SDH.
The subtitle shown above is a common format seen on many DVD titles using English subtitles. They often exclude people's names from the dialogues.
The subtitle shown above is a common format seen on many DVD titles using SDH. They often include people's names from the dialogues.
The subtitle shown above is a format seen on some DVD titles and is strongly disliked due to the lack of black strokes around the subtitles making it difficult to read if the background is too light.
The subtitles shown above are the SDH format Sony use on their Blu-ray titles. Like I told you, it bears a strong resemblance to the closed captioning style.
The subtitles shown above show a description of a sound heard in the background. This is the kind of information you can expect to find on a DVD/Blu-ray/HD DVD where SDH is used.
Nothing appears on the screen at all, this is what you can expect from watching a movie with English subtitles, it is obviously not formatted for the deaf and hard of hearing. It's for people who are learning English or these who like to read subtitles.
Here's another example of how English subtitles is formatted. In the dialogue, the person's name is spoken but isn't included in the subtitle because the hearing people will already know who the person is. So it is not necessary to name the person.
As you can see, both images above show subtitles including the person's name rather than excluding it. This is important for the deaf and hard of hearing consumers. They need to know who's saying these lines, if they don't include this kind of information, people may end up finding it difficult to follow the storyline and whose lines it is.
Whew, what a long blog entry. It’s a blog entry I started on last week but I had to put it off for a while. Now that I’m on my vacation, I decided to finish it and publish it. I hope many people will find the information useful and helpful and clear up the confusion among many deaf consumers when it comes to HDTV displays, DVD and the high definition video formats.
If you have any questions or have something to share, feel free to leave a comment.
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
Save Jericho: Mission Accomplished!
It's official. 'Jericho' will be brought back next year. No specific date has been set but it's likely to be somewhere in February or March, maybe April at the latest. They will be producing seven episodes. They are hoping that they will get more viewers. After all, publicity is what they need. We gave them the publicity and they have taken it in stride. The truth is, CBS has been quite patient with us and took the time to listen. Not many will even bother to listen. Here's a letter from the President of CBS Entertainment.
I command Nina Tassler for taking the time to listen. We have accomplished our mission in rescuing 'Jericho'. CBS opened its eye and realized the potential of 'Jericho'. By the way, the first season will be available on the DVD format on September 25. Buying the first season is a good way of showing support. I definitely will buy the first season on the DVD format.
We are in the middle of a major revolution of TV viewing. Which is why the Nielsen ratings aren't too accurate these days. From what I read, 17% of cable subscribers use DVR (Digital Video Recorder). A large number of them record television programs and they aren't counted in the statistics. 'Jericho' was on Apple iTunes. I imagine it wasn't counted either. Not only to mention a number of methods that some people may consider being illegal but I can tell you that millions of people downloaded the episodes through torrents. The only problem is, they often remove the advertisements. The advertisements are what keep the TV networks going. They are the life of every TV program out there except for HBO and pay channels.
In fact, CBS is thinking up a new brainstorm on changing that. They are going to think of new ways to get more viewers and make a profit from it. Let's hope they come up with some good ideas because it's not just 'Jericho' that is suffering from this problem. Every major TV series suffered too as well including 'Lost', '24', 'Heroes' and more.
CBS, thank you for acknowledging our efforts in saving 'Jericho'.
June 6, 2007
To the Fans of Jericho:
Wow!
Over the past few weeks you have put forth an impressive and probably unprecedented display of passion in support of a prime time television series. You got our attention; your emails and collective voice have been heard.
As a result, CBS has ordered seven episodes of “Jericho” for mid-season next year. In success, there is the potential for more. But, for there to be more “Jericho,” we will need more viewers.
A loyal and passionate community has clearly formed around the show. But that community needs to grow. It needs to grow on the CBS Television Network, as well as on the many digital platforms where we make the show available.
We will count on you to rally around the show, to recruit new viewers with the same grass-roots energy, intensity and volume you have displayed in recent weeks.
At this time, I cannot tell you the specific date or time period that “Jericho” will return to our schedule. However, in the interim, we are working on several initiatives to help introduce the show to new audiences. This includes re-broadcasting “Jericho” on CBS this summer, streaming episodes and clips from these episodes across the CBS Audience Network (online), releasing the first season DVD on September 25 and continuing the story of Jericho in the digital world until the new episodes return. We will let you know specifics when we have them so you can pass them on.
On behalf of everyone at CBS, thank you for expressing your support of “Jericho” in such an extraordinary manner. Your protest was creative, sustained and very thoughtful and respectful in tone. You made a difference.
Sincerely,
Nina Tassler
President, CBS Entertainment
P.S. Please stop sending us nuts :)
I command Nina Tassler for taking the time to listen. We have accomplished our mission in rescuing 'Jericho'. CBS opened its eye and realized the potential of 'Jericho'. By the way, the first season will be available on the DVD format on September 25. Buying the first season is a good way of showing support. I definitely will buy the first season on the DVD format.
We are in the middle of a major revolution of TV viewing. Which is why the Nielsen ratings aren't too accurate these days. From what I read, 17% of cable subscribers use DVR (Digital Video Recorder). A large number of them record television programs and they aren't counted in the statistics. 'Jericho' was on Apple iTunes. I imagine it wasn't counted either. Not only to mention a number of methods that some people may consider being illegal but I can tell you that millions of people downloaded the episodes through torrents. The only problem is, they often remove the advertisements. The advertisements are what keep the TV networks going. They are the life of every TV program out there except for HBO and pay channels.
In fact, CBS is thinking up a new brainstorm on changing that. They are going to think of new ways to get more viewers and make a profit from it. Let's hope they come up with some good ideas because it's not just 'Jericho' that is suffering from this problem. Every major TV series suffered too as well including 'Lost', '24', 'Heroes' and more.
CBS, thank you for acknowledging our efforts in saving 'Jericho'.
Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Save Jericho: Mission Accomplished?
Well, not yet. Though we are getting closer than ever.
A few hours ago, several reports started coming in regarding the cancelled TV series, 'Jericho'. It has been reported that CBS is now reconsidering the cancellation of 'Jericho'. I must say that I'm incredibly proud of the people who got involved with the campaign. With the number of people involved, we did make a big impact because CBS has realized that they may have made a mistake. They must had gotten the message since they got over 50,000 pounds of nuts from the fans of 'Jericho'. Wouldn't you say? What's really neat is that they are donating the nuts to charities including these that send care packages to troops overseas. Got to command CBS for making a good move on that part.
So far, it has been reported that there is a possibility that they will bring the show back onto the air mid-season. That would be somewhere near the beginning of spring 2008. Eight episodes are being considered for the second season, and it has been said that there will be reductions in the budget. I cannot say I'm surprised and this also means getting rid of some regular characters. Chances are it will be the secondary characters. Don't be surprised if the deaf character gets the boot. But who knows?
The big problem is that the sound stage they used for 'Jericho' is going to be used for the new CBS program, 'Swingtown'. Though in some of the reports, it says that they are trying to find ways to solve the problems associated with the sound stage, scheduling, cast members and more.
The show hasn't been officially saved yet. 'Jericho' has not been saved yet. CBS is definitely readying the plans and in talks with the cast members.
Let's keep hoping because we are getting closer to accomplishing our mission to save ‘Jericho’.
All we have to wait is for a press release from CBS to declare victory.
A few hours ago, several reports started coming in regarding the cancelled TV series, 'Jericho'. It has been reported that CBS is now reconsidering the cancellation of 'Jericho'. I must say that I'm incredibly proud of the people who got involved with the campaign. With the number of people involved, we did make a big impact because CBS has realized that they may have made a mistake. They must had gotten the message since they got over 50,000 pounds of nuts from the fans of 'Jericho'. Wouldn't you say? What's really neat is that they are donating the nuts to charities including these that send care packages to troops overseas. Got to command CBS for making a good move on that part.
So far, it has been reported that there is a possibility that they will bring the show back onto the air mid-season. That would be somewhere near the beginning of spring 2008. Eight episodes are being considered for the second season, and it has been said that there will be reductions in the budget. I cannot say I'm surprised and this also means getting rid of some regular characters. Chances are it will be the secondary characters. Don't be surprised if the deaf character gets the boot. But who knows?
The big problem is that the sound stage they used for 'Jericho' is going to be used for the new CBS program, 'Swingtown'. Though in some of the reports, it says that they are trying to find ways to solve the problems associated with the sound stage, scheduling, cast members and more.
The show hasn't been officially saved yet. 'Jericho' has not been saved yet. CBS is definitely readying the plans and in talks with the cast members.
Let's keep hoping because we are getting closer to accomplishing our mission to save ‘Jericho’.
All we have to wait is for a press release from CBS to declare victory.
Sunday, June 3, 2007
Photo Booth: A Whole Lot of Fun!
The other night, I was fooling around with Apple's Photo Booth. It's a novelty but it's always fun to play with once in a while when you're bored. I made some silly faces and used the effects found in Photo Booth. I'm sharing some of them with you tonight.
Enjoy!
Enjoy!
Sunday, May 27, 2007
Walls of Jericho: A Message
In this vlog, I have a message to both the deaf and hearing people who participated in the campaign to save the TV series, 'Jericho'. In the vlog, I share some of the details and facts that some may not be aware of. The vlog is subtitled, but for whom these who don't want the subtitles on, just turn it off by clicking onto the 'CC' logo if it's on. For the letter template and addresses as mentioned in the vlog, go here.
By the way, in the beginning of the vlog, you will find me playing a little game with you. The real message of the vlog will not start until after the 'Banjo's Vlog' title come up. I'm just trying to have fun with my viewers/readers. So if you want to skip the beginning, just drag the arrow till you reach 1:19.
There's also something else I want to mention. I recently added a new feature to my blog. It's from the website, 'Plugoo'. You can see it on the right side at the bottom; it's titled 'Talk to Banjo'. You can have a live conversation with me if you want to.
Just thought I'll let all of you know about it. I'm going to try it out as an experiment to see how well a blogger can interact with his readers/viewers. I hope the results will be good.
Have a good night.
By the way, in the beginning of the vlog, you will find me playing a little game with you. The real message of the vlog will not start until after the 'Banjo's Vlog' title come up. I'm just trying to have fun with my viewers/readers. So if you want to skip the beginning, just drag the arrow till you reach 1:19.
There's also something else I want to mention. I recently added a new feature to my blog. It's from the website, 'Plugoo'. You can see it on the right side at the bottom; it's titled 'Talk to Banjo'. You can have a live conversation with me if you want to.
Just thought I'll let all of you know about it. I'm going to try it out as an experiment to see how well a blogger can interact with his readers/viewers. I hope the results will be good.
Have a good night.
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Jericho: The 'Nuts' Campaign
Nuts Online, an online store that sells... well... nuts. They have decided to join the campaign to save the TV series, 'Jericho'. The best part is that they're taking advantage of the word, Nuts. The word was used back in World War II by an American general in response to the Germans. At least that's how some people tell the story. There are some that says otherwise. Go here to check the site out. The reason why they're using the word, 'Nuts' is because of what happened in the season... err... series finale. I can't really share many details because it would just spoil everything for the people who have yet to watch the show.
So, for these who want to take advantage of this opportunity, go ahead. CBS will get the message if you send them roasted nuts. So far, they have managed gather the orders with a current total of around 12,800 lbs of roasted nuts to ship off to CBS. That's a lot of nuts, I'll say!
It's amazing how big this campaign is getting in such a short period of time. The more we do this, the better chance we will see CBS caving in for a renewal of the TV series, 'Jericho'. If not, all we can hope for is for a different TV broadcaster to pick up the series.
Keep up the hard work, which has been quite impressive.
EDITED: I took out the inaccurate information on the word, 'Nuts'. Hatip to Kokonut Pundits for the correction.
So, for these who want to take advantage of this opportunity, go ahead. CBS will get the message if you send them roasted nuts. So far, they have managed gather the orders with a current total of around 12,800 lbs of roasted nuts to ship off to CBS. That's a lot of nuts, I'll say!
It's amazing how big this campaign is getting in such a short period of time. The more we do this, the better chance we will see CBS caving in for a renewal of the TV series, 'Jericho'. If not, all we can hope for is for a different TV broadcaster to pick up the series.
Keep up the hard work, which has been quite impressive.
EDITED: I took out the inaccurate information on the word, 'Nuts'. Hatip to Kokonut Pundits for the correction.
Friday, May 18, 2007
UPDATE: Save Jericho: The Letter-Writing Campaign
UPDATE: I have removed the e-mail addresses. I was recently informed that the e-mail addresses were recently disabled for obvious reasons. A commenter left an e-mail address for us to use.
audsvcs@cbs.com
Like the commenter, I also strongly encourage that we print out a hard copy and send it through the snail mail.
We are continuing the fight to get 'Jericho' renewed for the second season. We strongly believe that CBS made one of the worst mistakes to nuke 'Jericho' off the air. We are not alone; there are millions of fans out there that are now upset at the news of the cancellation. There's even an online petition that is nearing 50,000 signatures at the moment. That's just in 2 days. That is quite an achievement, no doubt about that. Though the only way to make this all worth it is to save 'Jericho' from oblivion. I have never done this before for any TV series in my life. It's not just because it happen to have a deaf character, it's actually a great show. That's the great part about having an ensemble cast. There's so much you can do with these characters.
'Jericho' is worth fighting for. Everybody, please help us out with our mission to rescue 'Jericho'. I have added a large amount of contact information for people involved with the TV program for all of you to write a letter to by e-mail or snail mail. You can also use Video Relay Service (VRS) to make a call. The phone numbers are listed below.
Even better, send a bag of nuts to CBS!
CBS Executives
Mr. Kelly Kahl
Senior Exec VP of Programming
CBS Television Network
51 West 52nd St.
New York, NY 10019
Ms. Nina Tassler, President
CBS Entertainment
7800 Beverly Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90039-2112
(323) 575-2747
Production Company
Junction Entertainment
500 South Buena Vista St.
Animation Bldg.
Burbank, CA 91521-1616
USA
Phone: 818-560-2800
Fax: 818-841-3176
Miscellaneous
CBS Television Affiliates
Save Jericho On CBS Petition
CBS.com Feedback Form
CBS Paramount: 323-956-5000
CBS Executive Comment: 323-575-4913
CBS Television City: 323-575-2345
You can also use the letter template I made in the last blog entry, just copy and paste it into your word processor and put your name on it, then print it out and mail it. Writing letters and sending it through the mail will make a bigger impact than it does through e-mail.
Good luck to everyone. We all need it.
audsvcs@cbs.com
Like the commenter, I also strongly encourage that we print out a hard copy and send it through the snail mail.
We are continuing the fight to get 'Jericho' renewed for the second season. We strongly believe that CBS made one of the worst mistakes to nuke 'Jericho' off the air. We are not alone; there are millions of fans out there that are now upset at the news of the cancellation. There's even an online petition that is nearing 50,000 signatures at the moment. That's just in 2 days. That is quite an achievement, no doubt about that. Though the only way to make this all worth it is to save 'Jericho' from oblivion. I have never done this before for any TV series in my life. It's not just because it happen to have a deaf character, it's actually a great show. That's the great part about having an ensemble cast. There's so much you can do with these characters.
'Jericho' is worth fighting for. Everybody, please help us out with our mission to rescue 'Jericho'. I have added a large amount of contact information for people involved with the TV program for all of you to write a letter to by e-mail or snail mail. You can also use Video Relay Service (VRS) to make a call. The phone numbers are listed below.
Even better, send a bag of nuts to CBS!
CBS Executives
Mr. Kelly Kahl
Senior Exec VP of Programming
CBS Television Network
51 West 52nd St.
New York, NY 10019
Ms. Nina Tassler, President
CBS Entertainment
7800 Beverly Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90039-2112
(323) 575-2747
Production Company
Junction Entertainment
500 South Buena Vista St.
Animation Bldg.
Burbank, CA 91521-1616
USA
Phone: 818-560-2800
Fax: 818-841-3176
Miscellaneous
CBS Television Affiliates
Save Jericho On CBS Petition
CBS.com Feedback Form
CBS Paramount: 323-956-5000
CBS Executive Comment: 323-575-4913
CBS Television City: 323-575-2345
You can also use the letter template I made in the last blog entry, just copy and paste it into your word processor and put your name on it, then print it out and mail it. Writing letters and sending it through the mail will make a bigger impact than it does through e-mail.
To (Insert recipient’s name here)
I wish to express my disappointment with the cancellation of 'Jericho'. This TV program is beloved and cherished by many TV viewers including the deaf and hard of hearing. 'Jericho' had a large range of strong characters with depth instead of one-dimensional characters including a well fleshed out deaf character, which is rare to be seen on the TV and at the movies.
The show is also unique because of the post-apocalyptic theme surrounding the humanizing stories featured on the program. It would be a great loss to see the TV series fade into oblivion because it wasn't given the chance to prove itself. Today, most TV programs aren't given the chance. They often get canceled within a few episodes. Some were lucky to stick around like 'Seinfeld' which wasn't popular till the third or fourth season.
I know many will be happy to see 'Jericho' stay on the air instead of getting nuked off the air after a great season, which also ended with an exciting cliffhanger. Please give 'Jericho' a chance to prove itself by keeping it on the air.
I hope that my voice has been heard and that it will be taken in consideration. Thank you for taking the time to read my letter.
Sincerely,
(Your name here)
Good luck to everyone. We all need it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)