More than ten years ago, high definition televisions started making their way onto the market. There are several resolutions available now including 480i, 480p, 720p, 768p, 1080i and 1080p. Now you may be asking how this concerns you and your needs. It's important that you know why.
For these unfamiliar with the resolutions I just mentioned, below is a picture showing the difference between all resolutions.

Here's an example, if you set your computer's resolution to 800x600. The last number, 600 would be known as 600p, for 1024x768, it would be 768p because all computer monitors are already in progressive.
If you have seen some people using terms like 1080p24 and 1080p60. Both 24 and 60 are refresh rates. 24 frames per second and 60 frames per second. The standard frame rate for movies is approximately 24 (23.97) frames per second. So that's basically the best way to watch movies. If you are to buy a 1080p HDTV, be sure to check that it offer this option.
The problem with a lot of HDTV displays is that they can be difficult to work with when it comes to closed captioning. Every time they make an upgrade in resolution, there will be a problem with closed captioning. Especially with two video inputs, DVI (Digital Visual Interface) and HDMI (High Definition Multimedia Interface). On many HDTV displays, the option to select CC is nowhere to be found when one of these inputs is on display.
Component video inputs, many offer CC as an option when the video input is on display. Though many DVD players will be unable to send the CC signal once it is set in progressive mode. Many deaf consumers end up using the DVD player in 480i even on their HDTV displays. It's the same situation in 720p and 1080i.
CC is an analog technology; the information is entered at every 21st line in the 480i mode. In the 480p mode, they have nowhere to put it because all 480 lines are displayed at once. They do now offer digital closed captioning on many HDTV displays. However, it's not as user-friendly as one would think. Not even with DVD players. There are at least 2 standard digital closed captioning modes that I know of. I'm still reading about many deaf consumers who face problems with their DVD players when the progressive mode is enabled. The truth is, no deaf consumer should ever have to put up with it.

This is an example of what an interlaced signal look like. The lines are much more visible in the interlaced mode. Only half of the 480 lines appear per frame.

This is what a progressive scan signal look like, the lines are much less visible because they all appear at once.
Now, we're moving onto SDH. It either stands for 'Subtitles for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing' or 'Subtitled for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing'. This is important for the deaf and hard of hearing consumers to understand. There is a difference between SDH and English subtitles when it's mentioned on the back of a DVD case. When it says, 'English Subtitles', it's not often formatted for the deaf. It will exclude all background noise, names, common words people may be familiar with, song lyrics and more.
Myself, I now prefer SDH because it guarantee that you will get access at any given time regardless of what you are using, a portable DVD player with a small LCD display, a TV with no closed captioning decoder built in, on the computer and more.
The truth is, the major studios are leaning toward SDH because of the easiness with working with them and the fact that people can subtitle the movies within the DVD authoring software. Apple's DVD Studio offers this option. Not only to mention that it's probably the cheaper solution because they won't have to pay for the captioning equipment, which isn't cheap. I have looked up the prices for some of the equipments and software used to caption movies, they are not as cost effective since many DVD authoring software already offer the option to subtitle movies.
Universal Studios was one of the first studios on the DVD format to use SDH instead of CC. Though it was labeled as captions for the first few years till the term, SDH was introduced. I am not sure why Universal Studios chose to go on this path to start with but I wouldn't be surprised if it was the progressive scan mode causing headaches at Universal Studios.
Two new high definition video formats, Blu-ray Disc and HD DVD (High Density Digital Versatile Disc) were released last year. The majority of the movies released on both high definition formats lack analog/digital closed captioning. I’m not entirely confident but I believe none of the movies available on either Blu-ray Disc or HD DVD include analog CC. I believe it’s due to the reason I mentioned earlier. The HDMI and DVI inputs often lack the ability to display CC. So the movie studios are going the SDH route to make it easier on the consumers. I will be the first to admit that it's not perfect yet because of how most of them format it. The dialogues should be placed all over the screen rather than dead-on centre on the screen through the whole movie. They also often lack a solid or transparent background behind the subtitles. But I am pleased to tell you that they do include all the information as they do with closed captioning on the DVD and VHS.
As far I can tell you, Fox Home Entertainment and Sony are the best when it comes to formatting the SDH. Fox Home Entertainment uses a strong black stroke all around the subtitles. Sony formats the SDH to bear a strong resemblance to the old-fashioned CC style, which I do appreciate. In fact, Sony even moves them around the screen like they do with CC. Though Sony's SDH style can only be found on their Blu-ray Disc titles.
I made some examples for you to look at to get the idea of how a SDH is formatted and the difference between English subtitles and SDH.
The subtitle shown above is a common format seen on many DVD titles using English subtitles. They often exclude people's names from the dialogues.
The subtitle shown above is a common format seen on many DVD titles using SDH. They often include people's names from the dialogues.

The subtitle shown above is a format seen on some DVD titles and is strongly disliked due to the lack of black strokes around the subtitles making it difficult to read if the background is too light.


The subtitles shown above are the SDH format Sony use on their Blu-ray titles. Like I told you, it bears a strong resemblance to the closed captioning style.


The subtitles shown above show a description of a sound heard in the background. This is the kind of information you can expect to find on a DVD/Blu-ray/HD DVD where SDH is used.

Nothing appears on the screen at all, this is what you can expect from watching a movie with English subtitles, it is obviously not formatted for the deaf and hard of hearing. It's for people who are learning English or these who like to read subtitles.

Here's another example of how English subtitles is formatted. In the dialogue, the person's name is spoken but isn't included in the subtitle because the hearing people will already know who the person is. So it is not necessary to name the person.


As you can see, both images above show subtitles including the person's name rather than excluding it. This is important for the deaf and hard of hearing consumers. They need to know who's saying these lines, if they don't include this kind of information, people may end up finding it difficult to follow the storyline and whose lines it is.
Whew, what a long blog entry. It’s a blog entry I started on last week but I had to put it off for a while. Now that I’m on my vacation, I decided to finish it and publish it. I hope many people will find the information useful and helpful and clear up the confusion among many deaf consumers when it comes to HDTV displays, DVD and the high definition video formats.
If you have any questions or have something to share, feel free to leave a comment.





Thanks for explaining the differences!
ReplyDeleteDo "Open Caption" movies at theatres use formatting for the deaf, or just subtitles?
I have Panasonic 50" HDTV Plasma.
ReplyDeleteIt works fine.
Got Comcast service to come and install cable box in order to get more channels...to my dismay the cable box can not get any captions on the screen whereas without cable box..I am able to get captions on every channels...so we decided not to use the cable box connected to our new TV. We have HDMI cable connected, etc. Many of our friends are now with Comcast and they do not have cable box which can be included captions on their tv screen. What should we do about it. Your suggestion will be appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Part of the problem is that DVI and HDMI do not have any standard for transmitting closed captioning information. In analog TV, the CC information is transmitted via line 21 as part of the signal, but with digital connections this information is stripped out.
ReplyDeleteBasically, when HDMI was designed and approved, people lacked the foresight to think about closed captions. I am not an expert in this area, but as far as I understand, the only solution would be to have the DVD player/cable box/whatever convert the captions to a subpicture.
You need to turn on the captions on the cablebox itself not the tv side. There is option you need to change to start showing the captions. But telling you comcast HD tv shows have problems with captioning. Many words are garbled or missing OFTEN. When switch to NON-HD show's then captions are better but sad at lousy pictures instead of HD pictures.......... This sucks!
ReplyDeleteComments:
ReplyDelete1.) Nice blog entry, Banjo. Although, I was hoping for a more technological review...sounds like I know as much as you do...
2.) I really hope that "SDH" becomes standarized...I think it's better if everything is standarized...
3.) Anonymous,
With a Comcast box...pick up your remote and follow these instructions:
1.) Press "Off" or "Power Off"
2.) Press "Menu"
3.) Use arrow keys to scroll up, down, left, and right to change the options. Play around with it and you'll see CC's...
I use 1080i because I always have problems with progressive scan...to me interlaced does not even make a difference to the naked eye.
Good luck...
J.J.
ReplyDelete"I use 1080i because I always have problems with progressive scan...to me interlaced does not even make a difference to the naked eye."
It will make a difference on displays bigger than 50 inches. Smaller than that, you won't be able to see a significant difference. I can see the difference on my 100" screen.
Though it's common knowledge among the tech geeks that the average consumer tend to lack a good eye. As a graphic designer, I can vow for that. Some people can't tell the difference between 72ppi and 170ppi on a printed paper if you can believe that.
Hee, oh well. :-)
Hi, I have 50" plasma tv and using digital cale card insert in back of tv instead of digital box, card only 9 dollars a month and box cost about 50 dollars a month.
ReplyDeleteI got a 50" TV...
ReplyDeleteYou have a 100 incher? Really? Can I visit sometime? :-)
I am guessing you have a celing mounted projector?
Yep, I cannot tell the difference between interlaced and progressive...I guess I would be able to do so if I could see both displays side by side....
Yep, a digital projector. :-)
ReplyDeleteEpson PowerLite Home Cinema 1080
http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/consumer/consDetail.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&oid=63068239
It's quite a great projector, one of the best 1080p projectors on the market.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteGreat article!
One important issue left out if using SDH as primary way to caption:
Live captions? Such as news with rolling captions? I do not think SDH is designged to support that.
How can we make sure SDH developers to include live captions?
Norman, I'm sorry but this one focuses on just the HDTV, DVD, and High-Def video formats.
ReplyDeleteI don't have enough experience with HDTV channels just yet. Though people did say that with some cable and satellite services, the captioning decoder was built into the receiver. That means you have to turn on the CC from the cable box and not the TV.
Banjo,
ReplyDeleteNo problem. I have two HDTVs using off air antenna. Very good captionings. I had to use 10 feet pole on top of roof with HD Antenna to get best reception. Yes I have enabled digital captions on HD receiver box.
I guess we are talking about EIA 708/608 captioning for cable, off-air, and dish receiver (Direct TV, Dish, etc) boxes. And use the SDH for HD DVD/Blue Ray players.
If we pursuit the idea of merging both technology into one standard in the future, make sure we include live captioning too.
Take care
That was me, Banjo. I have two different accounts, sometimes I forget to log into my other account instead of this.
ReplyDeleteNorman, just curious... what HD receiver box do you use?
ReplyDeleteThe truth is, I don't watch scheduled programming much these days. I record them instead.
Yes, live captioning is a must. No doubt about that.
If they were to air SDH over the air, that could be tricky because most TV sets won't be able to decode it because it's actually an image, not text. It's possible but they would have to add it as a feature in the digital receivers.
SDH is ideal for high definition video formats because no decoder is needed. It's a track and it's basically a guarantee you will be able to use the subtitles at any given time. With CC, that's not always possible. Too many portable DVD players (with LCD screen) lack CC decoders and a lot of HDTV sets still give people a hard time whenever it's in progressive mode.
So it's ideal to use SDH for home entertainment purposes to avoid inconvenience.
On vacation? And blogging? Hmmm.... should use vacation time to watch movies.
ReplyDeleteI've been looking up the CC issue as well. Even for non HDTV viewing, deaf people can have problems getting CC. Some stand alone DVRs will not record CC since the conversion to mpeg 2 encoding can strip the needed information so the information has to be saved in a separate stream. Oddly enough it doesn't prevent them from displaying them, just not able to play them back later. Computer based PVRs have an even worse record in this area with only one Happauge TV tuner card supporting a hidden caption recording mode at the time I did research on PVRs about 2-3 years ago. It may be better now though.
ReplyDeleteThat pretty much limits the market for free Tivo like devices that deaf people can actually use. I ended up with a Panasonic E85H HDD recorder since an email to support clarified that it does indeed record and play back closed caption.
Now with ATSC only broadcasting on the horizon, I am researching for a newer DVR with the same requirements, especially as I don't have a TV with an ATSC tuner and just bought a cheap projector without any tuner. The projector is really for DVD viewing anyway but I'd love to watch live NFL football on it with some sort of close captioning. I do plan on getting a nice HDTV but with standards changing so quickly, I have decided to hold off as long as possible especially as the new ones in the pipeline later this year will be much better and waiting for those to reach mass market prices makes sense. The projector I bought is 800x600 only but has a cheap bulb and fits standard DVD resolution so scaling artifacts isn't a factor.
The current situation is quite messy but it does look like there are a couple units out there that would work. I could still use my current NTSC based PVR but I would have to use either an IR Blaster to a set top box that has both an ATSC tuner and digital CC, or possibly just line in directly as in video dubbing and use the box for switching/captioning.
An easier method would be to get one of the ATSC tuner based recordable DVD drives that also supports digital CC. The best one currently out there is probably that new Philips HDD recorder with tuner that you can find at Walmart, it doesn't have a TV Guide like feature so strictly timer based recording.
One interesting aspect of the newer HDTV standards of Blu-ray and HD DVD is the ability to use raster fonts instead of bitmap for the subtitle stream. In theory the end user should be able to pick out a font and size to read the subtitles. This has gained quite a bit of interest in the anime watching community since many prefer to watch in the Japanese language and subtitles. The current DVD subtitle specs are quite limited to only a few colors and so on. Since SDH is really the same thing as regular subtitles with added descriptive information this should result in much more readable text as I despise having solid black backgrounds and all caps as in most normal close captioning on TV. I prefer having clear backgrounds and being able to choose the font color since in some cases the wrong color can be washed out in the background. Because of the black bar issue, I always choose the subtitle option over close caption option in watching my DVDs since it is less distracting and I never have any problems figuring out what is going on.
As to the two different ATSC closed captioning standards, hopefully the upcoming set top boxes that will be covered by a rebate will go with the newer MPEG placed captioning standard since that fits well with digital broadcast and is equally useful for SD or HD material. Those boxes will likely NOT offer actual HD resolution but upscale them as needed to lower costs. I'll have to read up on the MPEG caption standard to see if they included any more features as extra colors, transparent backgrounds, etc.