cle492001ca wrote:
"I heard his sense of smell was stronger because of the loss of his hearing. If there were fire, he would probably be the first to know about it. Very frugal."
You may be surprised to learn of the fact the smell of smoke is less than likely to wake you up.
Here is an article,
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3744/is_199812/ai_n8814288/
To quote,
"The scent of smoke aroused only 2 of the 10 subjects from their sleep, proving that people are less likely to smell things when they are sleeping."
2 out of 10? The odds are against you big time.
Besides, plastic object attached to a string? Please, let's not kid ourselves. That's only practical if it's in your viewing area, but it's not really practical to start with.
Mateo151 wrote:
"Although I can see a much more viable argument here, it seems to me that we all lived without all of these wonderful technologies as few as twenty years ago."
It's a different world today. Besides, deaf people struggled quite a lot back then. There were no closed captioning before the 1970s. There were no TTYs (phones for the deaf) in the first half of the 20th century. The technology available to the consumers today have made it easier for the deaf to live with more comfort and easiness. But there are still room for improvements to be made.
"Welcome to economics 101, the demand dictates the supply. "
Only if that was true in Canada. Certainly not the case when it comes to the cellphone market in Canada. A lot of people demand for better pricing plans with more choices in Canada only to get no results.
People need a better understanding of the issues surrounding people with disabilities and their needs. The only reason why they won't change the phone's pricing plans for the deaf is greed. Enough said.
Economics 101, the oldest excuse in the book on why to deny accessibility to Canadians with disabilities.